[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":157},["ShallowReactive",2],{"content-route-/en/research/rvvc-diagnostic-experiences-2026":3},{"state":4,"owner":4,"route":5,"locale":6,"template":7,"content":21,"projection":139,"alternates":148},"target","/en/research/rvvc-diagnostic-experiences-2026","en-US",{"kind":8,"family":8,"sectionKeys":9},"research-summary",[10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20],"bottom-line","why-source-matters","study-population","tested","results","applicability","limitations","contribution","practical-change","funding-conflicts","source",{"kind":8,"title":22,"description":23,"firstPublished":24,"evidenceAsOf":24,"lastUpdated":24,"changeNote":25,"research":26,"relations":53,"body":57},"How patients and clinicians experience recurrent-thrush diagnosis","Interviews in England describe recurrence documentation, test access, result interpretation, and diagnostic labeling as a connected pathway.","2026-07-15","Initial draft summary created from the selected source.",{"sourceId":27,"studyType":28,"population":29,"sampleScale":30,"contribution":31,"contributionRationale":32,"relatedEvidenceMap":33,"funding":34,"conflicts":35,"paperDate":36,"results":37,"applicability":40,"limitations":45,"practicalChange":52},"ford-rvvc-diagnostic-experiences-2026","Qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis and Candidacy Framework interpretation","32 people who self-identified as having recurrent thrush and 25 healthcare professionals working in primary care and sexual health services in England","57 interview participants (32 patients; 25 professionals)","contextual","This current qualitative study of 32 self-identifying patients and 25 professionals materially explains why recurrence documentation, testing access, and interpretation matter, while a summary can make its UK setting and inability to establish clinical effectiveness explicit.","/en/research/evidence/recurrent-vaginal-yeast-symptoms","Funding not reported.","Conflicts of interest not reported.","2026-06-01",[38,39],"Interviews with all 32 patient participants and 25 professionals identified diagnosis as a process involving recognition and documentation of recurrence, access to testing, interpretation of results, and a diagnostic label that opened management pathways.","The analysis described differing expectations and understandings as perceived missed opportunities across five Candidacy Framework stages; qualitative interviews do not provide a numerical effectiveness estimate.",{"appliesTo":41,"doesNotApplyTo":43},[42],"Understanding patient and professional experiences of recurrent-thrush diagnostic pathways in English primary care and sexual health services",[44],"Clinical effectiveness of a history tool, diagnostic accuracy, or access to testing outside England",[46,49],{"finding":47,"limitation":48},"Participants described documentation, testing access, interpretation, and labeling as connected parts of diagnosis.","Self-identifying patient recruitment and qualitative analysis cannot measure diagnostic accuracy or treatment outcomes.",{"finding":50,"limitation":51},"Patient and professional accounts exposed barriers and differing expectations.","The England setting does not establish the same service barriers in other health systems.","No practical change. The study informs history and appointment preparation but cannot establish diagnosis or prove that a tool improves outcomes.",[54],{"group":55,"route":33,"label":56},"evidence","Recurrent vaginal yeast symptoms evidence map",{"type":58,"value":59,"toc":135},"minimark",[60,68,74,80,86,92,98,104,110,116,122],[61,62,64],"content-section",{"section-key":10,"title":63},"Bottom line",[65,66,67],"p",{},"Patients and professionals described recurrent-thrush diagnosis as a multi-step pathway, not a single test or symptom judgment.",[61,69,71],{"section-key":11,"title":70},"Why this source matters",[65,72,73],{},"It explains why documenting episode patterns, gaining access to testing, and interpreting results can shape a person's route through care.",[61,75,77],{"section-key":12,"title":76},"Study and population",[65,78,79],{},"Researchers interviewed 32 self-identifying patients and 25 primary-care or sexual-health professionals in England.",[61,81,83],{"section-key":13,"title":82},"What was tested",[65,84,85],{},"The study explored experiences and perceptions through interviews; it did not test a diagnostic method, treatment, or history tool.",[61,87,89],{"section-key":14,"title":88},"Results",[65,90,91],{},"The thematic analysis connected pattern recognition, recurrence documentation, service access, test interpretation, and diagnostic labeling. It produced no numerical estimate of diagnostic or clinical effectiveness.",[61,93,95],{"section-key":15,"title":94},"Applicability",[65,96,97],{},"The findings help explain English care experiences and support preparing a structured history. They do not describe access in every health system.",[61,99,101],{"section-key":16,"title":100},"Limitations",[65,102,103],{},"Patients self-identified as having recurrent thrush, accounts were collected in England, and qualitative findings cannot establish diagnostic accuracy or outcome benefit.",[61,105,107],{"section-key":17,"title":106},"Contribution to the evidence",[65,108,109],{},"Contextual. The interviews clarify how people navigate diagnosis but do not test whether any pathway improves clinical outcomes.",[61,111,113],{"section-key":18,"title":112},"Practical change",[65,114,115],{},"No practical change. The study supports careful documentation and interpretation, not self-diagnosis or a treatment choice.",[61,117,119],{"section-key":19,"title":118},"Funding and conflicts",[65,120,121],{},"Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported in the canonical source record.",[61,123,125],{"section-key":20,"title":124},"Source",[65,126,127,134],{},[128,129,133],"a",{"href":130,"rel":131},"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41628983/",[132],"nofollow","Read the original publication"," (published 1 June 2026).",{"title":136,"searchDepth":137,"depth":137,"links":138},"",2,[],{"sources":140,"claims":146,"safety":147},[141],{"sourceId":27,"title":142,"canonicalId":143,"canonicalUrl":130,"publisher":144,"sourceType":145,"publicationDate":36,"lastChecked":24},"It's not just thrush, it's recurrent thrush: a qualitative study of patient and clinician perspectives on diagnosing recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis","doi:10.3399/BJGP.2025.0437","British Journal of General Practice","observational-study",[],[],[149,152,155],{"rel":150,"hreflang":6,"href":151},"alternate","https://candipedia.org/en/research/rvvc-diagnostic-experiences-2026/",{"rel":150,"hreflang":153,"href":154},"pl-PL","https://candipedia.org/pl/research/rvvc-doswiadczenia-diagnostyczne-2026/",{"rel":150,"hreflang":156,"href":151},"x-default",1784685064838]